Capital Punishment, Is The Execution Of Criminals By The State, For Co

Capital punishment, is the execution of criminals by the state, for committing crimes, regarded as the worst possible crimes that this is the only acceptable punishment around. Capital punishment does not only lower the murder rate, but its value as retribution alone is a good reason for handing out death sentences. Support for the death penalty in the U.S. has risen to an average of 80% according to an article written by Richard Worsnop, entitled Death penalty debate centers on retribution. This figure is slightly lower in Canada where support for the death penalty is at 72% of the population over 18 years of age, as stated in article by Kirk Makir, in the March 26, 1987 edition of the Globe and Mail, titled B.C MPs split on Death Penalty. The death penalty deters murder by putting the fear of death into would be killers. A person is less likely to do something, if he or she thinks that harm will come to them. Another way the death penalty deters murder, is the fact that if the killer is dead, he will not be able to kill again. Most supporters of the death penalty feel that offenders should be punished for their crimes, and that it does not matter whether it will deter the crime rate. Supporters of the death penalty are in favor of making examples out of offenders, and that the threat of death will be enough to deter the crime rate, but the crime rate is still not as important. According to a study done by Isaac Ehrlich, published on April 16, 1976, eight murders are deterred for each execution that is carried out in the United States. He then goes on to say If one execution of a guilty capital murder deters the murder of one innocent life, the execution is justified. To most supporters of the death penalty, like Ehrlich, if even one life is saved, for countless executions of the guilty, it is a good reason for the death penalty. The theory that society engages in murder when executing the guilty is considered to be not important by most supporters, including Ehrlich. He feels that execution of convicted offenders expresses the great value society places on innocent life. Issac Dhrlich goes on to state that racism is also a point used by death penalty advocates. I will use the U.S. as an example sense I can not look at the inmates on death row in Canada. Reason being there are laws in Canada that state that crime statistics can not be based on race, also the fact that there are no inmates on death row in Canada at this time. In the U.S. 16 out of every 1,000 whites arrested for murder are sentenced to death, while 12 of 1,000 blacks arrested for murder were sentenced to death. 1.1% of black inmates on death row were executed, while 1.7% or white inmates will die. Another cry for racism as according to Ehrilich, which is raised by advocates of the death penalty, is based on the color of the victim. For example if the victim is white, it is more likely that the offender will get the death penalty than if the victim had been black. This is true, if you look at the actual number of people who are murdered. More people kill whites and get the death penalty, then people who kill blacks and get the death penalty. The reason for this is that more whites are killed, and the murderers captured. Now if we look at the number of blacks killed it is a lot less. But you have to look at these numbers the same way. Percent wise it is almost the same number for any race, so this in not the issue. In a 1986 study done by professor Stephen K. Layson of the University of North Carolina, the conclusions made by Ehrilich were updated, and showed to be a little on the low side as far as the deterrence factor of capital punishment. Professor Layson found that 18 murders were deterred by each execution in the U.S. He also found that executions increase in probability of arrest, conviction, and other executions of major offenders. According to a